Improving Online Learning through the Use of Learning Management System Platform: A Technology Acceptance Model-Technology Readiness Index Combination Model Approach

Authors

  • Ilma Mufidah Telkom University
  • Luthfi Romiz Husaini Telkom University
  • Dino Caesaron Telkom University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.9744/jti.24.1.61-72

Keywords:

Online learning, technology acceptance model , technology readiness index.

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic push the learning revolution. The previous onsite learning is suddenly change to online learning. Current technological developments support the online learning application through the use of Learning Management System Platform. However, some problems are found during the application of online learning. Thus, this research aims to improve online learning through the use of Learning Management System Platform. The Technology Acceptance Model and the Technology Readiness Index model were combined to identify the critical factors influencing the intention to use Learning Management System. Fourteen hypotheses were proposed and tested using the Structural Equation Modelling method run in Partial Least Square software. The results indicated that eight hypotheses were accepted. The accepted hypothesis represents the criticality to consider innovativeness, job relevance, perceived enjoyment, perceived security and subjective norm in the Learning Management System usage during online learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Author Biographies

Ilma Mufidah, Telkom University

Faculty of Industrial Technology, Department of Industrial Engineering, Telkom University, Jl.Telekomunikasi 1, Terusan Buahbatu-Bojongsoang, Sukapura, Kabupaten Bandung, 40257 Indonesia

Luthfi Romiz Husaini, Telkom University

Faculty of Industrial Technology, Department of Industrial Engineering, Telkom University, Jl.Telekomunikasi 1, Terusan Buahbatu-Bojongsoang, Sukapura, Kabupaten Bandung, 40257 Indonesia

Dino Caesaron, Telkom University

Faculty of Industrial Technology, Department of Industrial Engineering, Telkom University, Jl. Telekomunikasi 1, Terusan Buahbatu-Bojongsoang, Sukapura, Kabupaten Bandung, 40257 Indonesia

References

Muhyiddin, M. and Nugroho, H., A Year of Covid-19: A Long Road to Recovery and Accceleration of Indonesia's Development, Jurnal Perencanaan Pembangunan: The Indonesian Journal of Development Planning, 5(1), 2021, pp. 1-9.

Churiyah, M. Sholikhan, S., Filianti, F., and Sakdiyyah, D., Indonesia Education Readiness Conducting Distance Learning in Covid-19 Pandemic Situation, International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 7(6), 2020, pp. 491-507.

Horton, W., Online Learning by Design, John Wiley & Sons, 2011.

Coman, C., Țîru, L., Meseșan-Schmitz, L., Stanciu C. and Bularca, M., Online Teaching and Learning in Higher Education during the Coronavirus Pandemic: Students’ Perspective, Sustainability, 12(24), 2020, p. 10367.

Mahyoob, M., Challenges of Online Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic Experienced by EFL Learners, Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 11(4), 2020.

Dhawan, S., Online learning: A Panacea in the Time of COVID-19 Crisis, Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 2020, pp. 5-22.

Zalat, M., Hamed, M., and Bolbol, S., The Experiences, Challenges, and Acceptance of Online Learning as a Tool for Teaching during the COVID-19 Pandemic among University Medical Staff, PloS one, 16(3), 2021, p. e0248758.

Aguilera-Hermida, A., College Students’ Use and Acceptance of Emergency Online Learning Due to COVID-19, International Journal of Educational Research Open, 1(100011), 2020, p. 1.

Buyle, R., Van, C. M., Mannens, R., Vanlishout, Z., Vlassenroot, E., and Mechant, P., Technology Readiness and Acceptance Model as a Pedictor for the Use Intention of Data Standards in Smart Cities, Media and Communication, 6(4), 2018, p. 127.

Zarafshani, K., Solaymani, A., D'Itri, M., Helms, M. M., and Sanjabi, S., Evaluating Technology Acceptance in Agricultural Education in Iran: A Study of Vocational Agriculture Teachers, Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 2(1), 2020, p. 100041.

Syahruddin, S., Yaakob, M., Rasyad, A., Widodo, A. Sukendro, S., Suwardi, S., Lani, A., Sari, L., Mansur, M., Razali, R., and Syam, A., Students’ Acceptance to Distance Learning during Covid-19: the Role of Geographical Areas among Indonesian Sports Science Students, Heliyon, 2021, p. e08043.

Davis, F. D., A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-user Information Systems: Theory and Results, PhD diss., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1986.

Holden, R., and Karsh, B., The Technology Acceptance Model: Its Past and Its Future in Health Care, Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 43(1), 2010, p. 159.

Venkatesh, V., and Davis, F., A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies, Management Science, 46(2), 2020, pp. 186-204.

Venkatesh, V., and Bala, H., Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions, Decision Sciences, 39(2), 2008, pp. 273-315.

Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I., Belief., Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Philosophy and Rhetoric, 50(2), 1975, pp. 179-221.

Okcu, S., Koksalmis, G. H., Basak, E., & Calisir, F., Factors Affecting Intention to Use Big Data Tools: an Extended Technology Acceptance Model, Industrial Engineering in the Big Data Era, Springer, Cham, 2019, pp. 401-416.

Ullah, N., Integrating TAM/TRI/TPB Frameworks and Expanding Their Characteristic Constructs for DLT Adoption by Service and Manufacturing Industries-Pakistan Context. International Conference on Technology and Entrepreneurship (ICTE), IEEE, 2020, pp. 1-5.

Mutahar, A. M., Daud, N. M., Ramayah, T., Putit, L., and Isaac, O., Examining the Effect of Subjective Nnorms and Compatibility as External Variables on TAM: Mobile Banking Acceptance in Yemen, Science International, 29(4), 2017, pp. 769-776.

Usman, O., Septianti, A., and Susita, Marsofiyati. The Effect of Computer Self-efficacy and Subjective Norm on the Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use and Behavioural Intention to Use Technology, Journal of Southeast Asian Research, 2020, p. 11.

Al-Rahmi, Mugahed, W., Yahaya, N., Aldraiweesh, A. A., Alamri, M. M., Aljarboa, N. A., Alturki, U., and Aljeraiwi, A. A., Integrating Technology Acceptance Model with Innovation Diffusion Theory: An Empirical Investigation on Students’ Intention to Use E-learning Systems, IEEE Access, 2019, 7, pp. 26797-26809.

Salloum S.A, Alhamad, A.Q. M., Al-Emran, M., Monem, A. A., and Shaalan, K., Exploring Students’ Acceptance of E-learning Through the Development of a Comprehensive Technology Acceptance Model, IEEE Access, 7, 2019, pp. 128445-128462.

Panday, R., The Effect of Technology Readiness on Technology Acceptance in Using Services Delivery of Academic Information System, 2015.

Alomary, Azza and Woollard, J., How is Technology Accepted by Users? A Review of Technology Acceptance Models and Theories, Proceedings of The IRES 17th International Conference, London, 2015.

Taherdoost, H., A Review of Technology Acceptance and Adoption Models and Theories, Procedia Manufacturing, 22, 2018, pp. 960-967.

Rahimi, B., Nadri, H., Afshar, H., and Timpka, T., A Systematic Review of the Technology Acceptance Model in Health Informatics, Applied Clinical Informatics, 9(3), 2018, p. 604.

Hubert, M., Blut, M., Brock, C., Zhang, R., Koch, V., and Riedl, R., The Influence of Acceptance and Adoption Drivers on Smart Home Usage, European Journal of Marketing, 53(6), 2019, pp. 1073-1098.

Subawa, N., Dewi , N., and Gama, A., Differences of Gender Perception in Adopting Cashless Transaction Using Technology Acceptance Model, The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 8(2), 2021, p. 617.

Byrd IV, T. F., Kim, J. S., Yeh, C., Lee, J., and O'Leary, K. J., Technology Acceptance and Critical Mass: Development of a Consolidated Model to Explain the Actual Use of Mobile Health Care Communication Tools, Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 117, 2021, p. 103749.

Diop, E., Zhao, S., and Duy, T., An Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model for Understanding Travelers’ Adoption of Variable Message Signs, PLoS One, 14(4), 2019, p. e0216007.

Ngabiyanto, Nurkhin, A., Widiyanto, Saputro, I., and Kholid, Teacher’s Intention to Use Online Learning; an Extended Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Investigation, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1783(1), 2021, p. 012123.

Safeena, R., Date, H., Hundewale, N., and Kammani, A., Combination of TAM and TPB in Internet Banking Adoption, International Journal of Computer Theory and Engineering, 5(1), 2013, p. 146.

Wang, Y., Shao, Y. E., Tsai, Y. S., Jiang, Y., Zhu, W., Wenmin, W., & Liang, T., Online Purchase Intention Based on TAM and IAM: A Literature Review. International Journal of e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning, 8(2), 2018, pp. 66-73.

Lemay D., Doleck, T., and Bazelais, P., The Influence of the Social, Cognitive, and Instructional Dimensions on Technology Acceptance Decisions among College-Level Students, EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(12), 2018, p. em1635.

Parasuraman, A, Technology Readiness Index (TRI) a Multiple-item Scale to Measure Readiness to Embrace New Technologies, Journal of Service Research, 2(4), 2000, p. 307.

Syamfithriani, T., Mirantika, N., Yusuf, F., and Kurniadi, E., E-Commerce Application Acceptance Analysis Using Technology Readiness Index (TRI) Model in Kuningan Regency., Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1933(1), 2021, p. 012012.

Rinjany, D., Does Technology Readiness and Acceptance Induce more Adoption of E-Government? Applying the UTAUT and TRI on an Indonesian Complaint-Based Application, Policy & Governance Review, 4(1), 2020, pp. 68-86.

Jarrar, Y., Awobamise, A., and Sellos, P., Technological Readiness Index (TRI) and the Intention to Use Smartphone Apps for Tourism: A Focus on InDubai Mobile Tourism Ap, International Journal of Data and Network Science, 4(3), 2020, pp. 297-304.

Bakirtaş, H. and Akkaş., C., Technology Readiness And Technology Acceptance of Academic Staffs, Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi,16(4), 2020, pp. 1043-1058.

Parasuraman, A., and Colby, C. L., Techno-ready Marketing: How and Why your Customers Adopt Technology, New York: Free Press, 2001.

Tsikriktsis, N., A Technology Readiness-based Taxonomy of Customers: A Replication and Extension. Journal of service research, 7(1), 2004, pp. 42-52.

Chuttur, M., Overview of the Technology Acceptance Model: Origins, Developments and Future Directions, Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems, 9(37), 2009.

Park, S. Y., An Analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model in Understanding University Students’ Behavioral Intention to Use online learning, Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 2014, pp. 150-162.

Roca, J. C., Garcia, J. J., and de la Vega, J. J., The Importance of Perceived Trust, Security and Privacy in Online Trading Systems, Information Management and Computer Security, 17(2), 2009, pp. 96-113.

Venkatesh, V. and Morris, M. G., Why Don’t Men Ever Stop to Ask For Directions? Gender, Social Influence, and Their Role in Technology Acceptance and Usage Behavior, MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 24(1), 2000, pp. 115-136.

Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., and Anderson, R., Multivariate Data Analysis 7th Edition, New York: Pearson, 2010.

Nunnally, J., and Bernstein, L., Psychometric Theory, New York: McGraw-Hill Higher, 1994.

Amirrudin, M., Nasution, K., and Supahar, Effect of Variability on Cronbach Alpha Reliability in Research Practice, Jurnal Matematika, Statistika & Komputasi, 17(2), 2021, pp. 223-230.

Bradley, J. V., Robustness?, British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 31(2), 1978, pp. 144-152.

Hooper, D., Couhglan, J., and Mullen, M. R., Structural Equation Modelling: Guidelines for Determining Model Fit, The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6, 2008, pp. 53-60.

Yaseen, H., Alsoud, A. R., Nofal, M., Abdeljaber, O and Al-adwan, A. S., The Effects of Online Learning on Students' Performance: A Comparison between UK and Jordanian Universities, International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(20), 2021,pp. 4-18.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-02

Issue

Section

Articles