Teknik Squat dan Stoop Menggunakan Electromyography pada Pekerjaan Manual Materials Handling

Authors

  • I Wayan Surata Fakultas Teknik, Jurusan Teknik Mesin, Universitas Udayana. Kampus Bukit Jimbaran, Bali 80361

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.9744/jti.15.1.33-38

Keywords:

Electromyography, squat, stoop, muscles activation, musculoskeletal.

Abstract

Manual materials handling has been identified as the most common cause of work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Among the manual material handling activities, lifting has long been regarded as an activity associated with a high risk of low-back pain. Lifting studies have mainly focused on the squat and stoop lifting techniques as an effort to improve the protection of workers from low back discomfort. However, neither is ideal and the benefits of one technique over another have proved inconclusive. The purpose of this study was to examine and compare the squat and stoop lifting techniques through analysis of muscles activation by using electromyography. Six volunteers participated in the study, and were required to lift a weight with squat and stoop techniques, with two types of loading at 1,7 kg and 6,7 kg. Observations were made on the rectus femoris, biceps femoris, and multifidus muscles. The results of study showed that the squat technique had higher levels of muscle activation compared to stoop technique on rectus femoris muscle. On the contrary, squat technique had lower muscle activation compared to stoop technique on biceps fermoris muscle. Meanwhile, both techniques squat and stoop had the same level of muscle activation on multifidus muscle. Conclusion, squat and stoop lifting techniques had the same opportunities to use.

References

Ayoub, M. M., and Mital, A., Manual Materials Handling, Taylor & Francis Publishers, London, 1989.

Bazrgari, B., Shirazi-Adl, A., and Arjmand, N., Analysis of Squat and Stoop Dynamic Lifting: Muscle Forces and Internal Spinal Loads. Journal of Eur Spine, 16, 2007, pp. 687-699.

Delitto, R. S., and Rose, S.J., An Electromyographic Analysis of Two Techniques for Squat Lifting and Lowering. Journal of Physical Therapy, 72, 1992, pp. 438-448.

Dieen, J. H. V., Hoozemans, M. J. M. V.,and Toussaint, H. M. V., A Review of Biomechanical Studies on Stoop and Squat Lifting. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 44, 2000, pp. 643-646.

Gant, L., Fethke, N., and Gerr, F., Spectral Analysis of Root-Mean-Square Processed Surface Electromyography Data as a Measure of Repetitive Muscular Exertion. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 56, 2012, pp.1140-1144.

Gill, K. P., Bennett, S. J., Savelsbergh, G. J. P., and van Dieen, J. H., Regional Changes in Spine Posture at Lift Outset with Changes in Lift Distance and Lift Style, Journal of Eur Spine, 32, 2007, pp. 1599-1604.

Grandjean, E., Fitting the Task to the Man, Taylor & Francis Publishers, London, 2000.

Hassanlouei, H., Nielsen, L. A., Kersting, U. G., Falla, D., Effect of Exercise-Induced Fatigue on Postural Control of the Knee. Jornal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 22(3), 2012, pp. 342-347.

Khoiri, M., Tinjauan Aplikasi Elektromiografi dalam Ergonomi. Seminar Nasional IV SDM Teknologi Nuklir, Yogyakarta, 2008, pp. 217-223.

Kingma, I., Boch, T., Bruins, L., and van Dieen, J. H., Foot Positioning Instruction, Initial Vertical Load Position and Lifting Technique: Effects on Low Back Loading. Journal of Ergonomics, 47, 2004, pp. 1365-1385.

Kumar, S., and Mital, A., Electromyography in Ergonomics. Taylor & Francis Publisher, London, 1996.

Kumashiro, M., Evaluation of Human Work: Practical Measurement of Psychophysiological Functions for Determining Workloads, Taylor & Francis Publishers, London, 2005, pp. 605-627.

Lee, P. J., Lee, E. L., and Hayes, W. C., Biomechanical Trade-Offs in Manual Material Handling: Some Tasks Reduce Lumbar Loading but Increase Thoracic Loading. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 56, 2012, pp.1192-1195.

Marras, W., Selected Topics in Surface Electromyography for Use in the Occupational Setting: Expert Perspectives, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 1992.

Mawston, G. A., and Boocock, M. G., The Effect of Lumbar Posture on Spinal Loading and the Function of the Erector Spinae: Implications for Exercise and Vocational Rehabilitation. Journal of Physiotherapy, 40(3), 2012, pp. 135-140.

Nou, D., Miller, B. J., and Fathallah, F. A., Low Back Muscle Fatigue Measurements of Cyclic and Prolonged Stooped Work, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 56, 2012, pp.1996-1200.

Oborne, D.J., Ergonomics at Work. John Wiley & Sons, 1988.

O’Brien, A., and O’Sullivan, L., A Biomechanical, Physiological and Psychophysical Study of the Squat, Stoop, and Semi-squat Lifting Techniques, Proceedings of the Irish Ergonomics Society Annual Conference, 2005, pp. 24-31.

Straker, L., Evidence to Support Using Squat, Semi-squat and Stoop Techniques to Lift Low-lying Objects. Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 31, 2003a, pp. 149-160.

Straker, L. M., A Review of Research on Techniques for Lifting Low-lying Objects: 2. Evidence for a Correct Technique. IOS Press, 20, 2003b, pp. 83-96.

Theado, E. W., Knapik, G.G., Marras, W.S., Modification of an EMG-Assisted Biomechanical Model for Pushing and Pulling. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 37(11-12), 2007, pp. 825-831.

Wang, Z., Wu, L., Sun, J., He, L., Wang, S., and Yang, L., Squat, Stop, or Semi-Squat: A Comparative Experiment on Lifting Technique. Journal of Huazhong University of Sciences and Technology, 32(4), 2012, pp. 630-636.

Downloads

Issue

Section

Articles